Prep Baseball Report

College Prospect Mailbag: January 9

David Seifert
Director of College Scouting

JANUARY 9, 2018

I just watched the Coffee & Curveballs cast from the ABCA convention where you mentioned a few of the top round sophomore-eligible prospects this year. Who are some of the others you did not mention?
In case you missed the cast, it’s easy to catch up on all episodes of Coffee and Curveballs. We discussed a potential top 10 overall pick, LHP Ryan Rolison (Mississippi), as well as RHPs Zach Hess (Louisiana State), Blair Henley (Texas) and Jon Heasley (Oklahoma State). CF Zach Watson (LSU) was also included in our discussion.

Additional top-round sophomore-eligible prospects include: RHPs Austin Bergner (North Carolina), Zach Linginfelter (Tennessee), Gregory Veliz (Miami), Reid Schaller (Vanderbilt), Caleb Killian (Texas Tech), Cody Morris (South Carolina), OF Carlos Cortes (South Carolina), C Lyle Lin (Arizona State) and two-way talent OF/LHP Evan Lee (Arkansas). Big-armed RHP Dalton Feeney (North Carolina State) had Tommy John surgery and will not pitch this spring, but is eligible to be drafted as well. Overall, it’s quite a year for higher round sophomore-eligible prospects.

/var/www/html/login/modules/Playerss/shortcodes.json not found
Evan Lee (Arkansas)

What is your opinion on the use of statistical analysis for the amateur draft?
Analytics for the amateur draft are informative, useful and are here to stay. When implemented correctly, they provide a huge boost to an amateur scouting department. I am a strong supporter of analytics when used to supplement the overall evaluation of a prospect. Just like a health history, vision test, personality/psychology test and other means used to judge a prospect. I oppose analytics when they are used as the lone source for the evaluation, especially when a scout has seen the player, scouted the tools and does not have interest. Believe me, it does happen, and it’s a demoralizing experience for an area scout. Overall, I like to call my opinion a balanced and team approach.

Which schools have multiple potential first-round picks for this year’s draft?
Short answer: there are many this season. The draft offers very few guarantees, but the Florida Gators boast a near sure thing with potential first-round RHPs Brady Singer and Jackson Kowar. Both prospects pitch in the low 90s with a plus off speed offering. Singer has a wipeout slider and Kowar features a swing-and-miss changeup. In the Northwest, Nick Madrigal leads another talented Oregon State club. Whether the Beavers have two first-round picks in Madrigal and senior LHP Luke Heimlich remains to be seen. A week prior to last year’s draft, news broke of Heimlich’s status as a registered sex offender, which occurred when he was 15 years old. He was considered a first-round talent, but went undrafted. Teams have now had time to do their due diligence. It’s hard to predict the outcome this June, but Heimlich is a talented pitcher who has posted outstanding numbers his entire college career. Also, Beaver SS Cadyn Grenier has first round tools, and if he can get his offensive performance to match, history tells us that college shortstops rise in the draft, potentially giving the Beavers three first rounders.

Other programs with multiple potential first rounders are Texas Christian, Stanford, Arkansas, Kentucky and Wichita State. The Horned Frogs boast the power bat of 1B Luken Baker, as well as talented starting RHP Sean Wymer. The Cardinal could see LHP Kris Bubic, polished SS Nico Hoerner and, if healthy, RHP Tristan Beck taken in the first round. The Razorbacks tout RHP Blaine Knight and strong-armed backstop Grant Koch. Knight received first-round consideration last June as a sophomore-eligible. Koch has a chance for the first round with another solid offensive showing and improvement in his receiving skills this spring. He led Team USA’s Collegiate National Team in hitting this summer (.372/.500/.535) with two home runs in 43 at bats. Catchers who hit tend to do well in the draft. In Lexington, the Wildcats also have two potential first-round picks. They will send 6-foot-11 RHP Sean Hjelle to the mound on Friday nights this spring with long, athletic bodied OF Tristan Pompey hitting in the middle of their lineup. Hjelle pitches in the low 90s with a plus curveball. Pompey had a huge sophomore season for the Wildcats (.361/.464/.541), but struggled this summer in the Cape Cod League (.230/.284/.345). The Shockers saw their two big bats blossom in the Cape, both earning all-star honors. 1B/3B Alec Bohm boasts a strong combination of power with plate discipline while athletic OF/1B Greyson Jenista earned MVP honors (.310/.391/.401).

 What are the best & worst drafts in recent history?
Off the top of my head, the best draft classes I can recall are the 2009 Angels and the 2006 Yankees. Some drafts like the Dodgers in 2006, when they took Kershaw seventh overall, must also be considered a great draft, but that draft produced him and not much else for the Dodgers.

It’s awfully hard to top the Angels’ selections of Randal Grichuk (First round, 24th overall), Mike Trout (1/25), Tyler Skaggs (1/40), Garrett Richards (1/42) and Patrick Corbin (2/80), but the 2006 Yankees may have done it based on the depth of major league contributors throughout the draft. The Yankees had only one extra pick at the top of the draft, yet still managed to have a draft for the ages. First rounder Ian Kennedy has produced a strong career as a mid-rotation starter. Joba Chamberlain (1/41) was once a household name and lockdown reliever. Zach McAllister (3/104) and George Kontos (5/164) have delivered solid careers as dependable relievers. As the draft continued, the Yankees’ selections become even stronger with Dellin Betances (8/254), Mark Melancon (9/284) and finally ace closer David Robertson (17/524). The 2006 draft did not land a franchise player for the Yankees, but it did produce numerous big leaguers who have already combined for 48 years of service time in the major leagues.

As far as the worst draft, the one that comes immediately to mind is Tampa Bay’s 2011 draftThe Rays had 10 of the first 60 overall picks. They had numerous extra picks that year as a result of losing multiple free agents (Carl Crawford, Rafael Soriano, Grant Balfour, Brad Hawpe, Joaquin Benoit, Randy Choate, Chad Qualls). This draft should have set up the Rays to replenish their farm system and continue their annual success into the playoffs. But, it hasn’t turned up much at all. Seven of their top 10 picks have not reached the major leagues. LHP Blake Snell, who was their seventh pick at 52nd overall, is the only pick among those 10 who has a chance to be more than an up-and-down major leaguer. Unless Snell turns into Kershaw, the 2011 draft of the Rays will always be known as a historically poor draft.

Actually, 2011 was a year of many bad drafts. It’s notorious for being the last year of the draft with no bonus pools. Several teams attempted to capitalize on the unlimited spending, which has delivered mixed results. The Pirates ($17 million), Nationals ($15M), Royals ($14M), Cubs ($12M), Diamondbacks ($11.9M), Rays ($11.5M), Mariners ($11.3M), Padres ($11M), Blue Jays ($11M) and Red Sox ($11M) were the biggest spenders. The Cubs (2016) and Royals (2015) won World Series. After a 2013 World Series title, the Red Sox also won AL East titles in 2016 and 2017. The Blue Jays made an appearance in the 2015 ALCS, yet the top major league performer from their 2011 draft has been senior sign and 32nd-rounder Kevin Pillar. The Nationals drafted Anthony Rendon (sixth overall), but found very little else for their $15 million. For others like the Pirates, who have Gerrit Cole, Josh Bell and Tyler Glasnow to show for their $17 million, the money has resulted in mild success with a couple early-round playoff appearances. For the Padres and Mariners it has not worked out so well with zero playoff appearances between them.

Have a question about college prospects? Email David Seifert at [email protected] or tweet at him @dseifertD1PBR

Related Content

Premium Content Area

This article is only available to PBRPlus Subscribers. If you wish to continue reading this article:

Login to the Subscriptions Website.
To purchase a NEW SUBSCRIPTION, please click here to go to our subscription products page.